Tuesday, February 16, 2021

Snow shoveling thoughts

We got dumped on, along with much of the Western world, especially America, and I spent a good hour and a half huffing big piles of snow out of our driveway and walkway this morning instead of jumping right on work, like I'd normally have done. I probably should have woken up my teenaged son, but I was caught a bit off guard by how much snow we had, so I didn't, and before I realized that I was a bit over my head in terms of getting it down quickly, I was already well underway and just went with it. Because sitting outside in the snow shoveling by myself for the better part of an hour and half (maybe about an hour, really—after that my neighbor was out too and we chatted while we worked a bit) is a good excuse to think about stuff. Granted, your mind is likely to wander anyway. Anyway, in the order I thought of them, here's a summary of some of the stuff that crossed my mind.

1) I had some Beach Boys songs stuck in my head while working, at least for a while, and I got to thinking of the British Invasion, which put the entire music style of the Beach Boys and their pop trajectory out of business—with the curious exception of the Beach Boys themselves, who weathered the change fairly well for a time. As near as I can tell, however, with the exception of the Beatles, almost nobody who's not a Boomer is very impressed with the British Invasion music, and even the Beatles themselves are mostly coasting on the reputation that the Boomers gave them. It's not fair to say that the Boomers made the Beatles while the Beatles had no talent; they were talented, and would have probably been stars regardless. But the best band ever? That's a bizarre boomer affectation that some other people have believed because they repeat it like parrots. The reality is that other than the boomers, the Beatles stock isn't really super high, and I have a feeling that when the last boomer finally dies, the Beatles will become more or less as forgotten as Glenn Miller, Peggy Lee or Guy Lombardo is now; known to a few music historians, and not exactly unappreciated by those who hear them, but otherwise getting a shrug of ignorance from the mainstream.

2) Why has "marketing" or whomever it is that's done this, collapsed generations so that entire generations are now "missing" from the list of generations? Everyone knows the boomers for various reasons—most of them unflattering—and the same is true for the Millennials. (Also unflattering.) And everyone knows Generation-X, although their profile is more understated compared to their narcissistic, attention-whoring older groups mentioned before. But the boomers didn't give way to Gen-x who in turn gave way to the Millennials; book-ending Gen-X are two other generations which are largely forgotten for some reason; Generation Jones and Generation-Y. Why this is the case isn't exactly clear to me, as there are notable differences between those generations and the ones on either end of them, so combining them is a poor idea if you want to understand the generations generally, I think.

3) Speaking of which, in some ways, you can define the generations by the pop culture of their time. (The same can be done to some degree with decades in general, although the 60s, for instance, would come across as schizophrenic if done this way; the early 60s was what most people think the 50s were like, and the late 60s and early 70s is what most people think of when they think of the 60s. If from a pop culture music perspective, the Boomers are defined by the British Invasion, you could almost suggest that Generation-X is defined in large part by the second British Invasion, and the impact that its music made on domestic music in general. It seems like the sinking of Gen-X music in the 90s in favor of the grunge wave could be compared to the Disco Demolition Night and the backlash against disco that it represented. However, the backlash in the late 70s was real and organic; the backlash against New Wave was artificial and driven by the labels looking for some way to reorient themselves. The 80s was even more defined by the tribalized music subcultures than by the second British invasion itself, and the New Wave pop was, if anything, the closest thing to mainstream success during much of the decade until some hair band rock started reasserting itself; artists like Bon Jovi, Poison, etc. But later in the 90s, grunge itself kinda disappeared, as well as the rest of the self-important, "activist" type music that was so popular in the 90s, to be replaced by pop music that sounded more like an organic growth from where the 80s had been. Gen-Y's music seems to have been a strange discontinuity that we've mostly "paved over" and ignore as much as we can, as if it never really was important. In general, if you're still pretty young, in your 20s, and you find yourself thinking something akin to "kids today and their terrible music" your generational cohort has probably recently rolled over.

4) The gamma male personality is one that can be made or not at a pivotal point in a young person's life. Some people naturally have that tendency, of course—especially if they're a little different than mainstream in their interests or personality. Someone who, like me, for instance, grew up liking science fiction, liked academic curiousity (on certain topics, at least), was fascinated with Dungeons & Dragons, and listened to aggressively stylish music and disassociated myself especially from country music, which in Texas in the 80s, was a pretty mainstream kinda thing—can find themselves outside of "polite society" in the cutthroat Lord of the Flies environment that is the American school system.  Guys like Adam Reader of the Professor of Rock channel on Youtube, for instance, talk a lot about being bullied, and hiding from it in their walkmans, or whatever. This is exactly what you don't want to do if avoiding turning out gamma is your goal. Don't hide. Don't look for an amenable authority like a teacher or whatever to fight your battles for you. You have to figure out a way to deal with it yourself. If you don't, you'll lay patterns for resentment, lack of self-respect, and bitter entitlement that will be extremely difficult to overcome as an adult; the hallmarks of the gamma male personality. Now, this doesn't necessarily mean getting into fist fights with would be bullies, although often that is the best solution, but it does mean that you need to come up with something that you are responsible for to deal with the situation, so that you know that you solved your own problems, and have the confidence and self-respect that comes from exactly that pattern. And if you are going to go different than the world—something that as a practicing Christian, I certainly encourage—then you also have to develop the habit of simply not caring very much what other people think of you, because the world will never accept you, because you reject it.

5) On a lighter note, for literally years I had been trying—albeit not in any kind of concerted way—to figure out this minor hit from the middle 80s that I had heard a few times on the radio, but never got the title or artist, and then couldn't find. I stumbled across it completely by accident recently; "Calling America" by Electric Light Orchestra. So... nice! Although those guys were pretty whack looking, even for by 80s standards. Like the comments in this video point out; the leader of the band looks like your stereotypical campus marijuana dealer.

Friday, February 12, 2021

Takach Kingdom

This isn't a star mapping data sheet, although I do need to do four of them for the Takach Kingdom. Rather, I'm noodling around with exactly what the Takach Kingdom actually is. When I did the allied worlds, I didn't necessarily mean that they were in any kind of formal alliance, but maybe that they shared some kind of cultural or ethnic ties that might be expected to have some relevancy in the event of open conflict. Such was the case, I think, with my initial thoughts on the Takach Kingdom, which are four adjacent systems that came out as "light green"; i.e., allied with the Cilindareans. Keep in mind that the Cilindareans started off as my "Ad Astra Mandalorians" although they've evolved into being more explicitly space Vikings and space Spartans, even complete with Greek titles, like Anax for the kings within the Cilindarean Arm polity, and the presence of space helots and space mothakes.

I've also come up with the Janissaries, the freed descendants of people who were, under the very late Marian Empire, in a situation not unlike the historical Janissaries. Because I had proposed that the Janissaries were a separate ethnic group, related to, but now distinct because of that crucible of having served the Marians in a janissary state, I often assumed that most of the "light green" worlds on my map were actually Janissary worlds. But the reality is that this doesn't have to be true. The light green worlds could be allies of the Cilindareans for all kinds of other reasons too; it could be independent feudal Cilindarean lords, it could be worlds of helots or penestae, or they could be totally different peoples that for whatever reason gained the respect of the Cilindareans or their leaders, and therefore were in alliance with the Cilindareans without owing actual fealty or being actual provinces or what-have-you of the Cilindarean Arm.

Long ago when I first started this project, I wrote this about the Takach Kingdom:

One nation that has stood firm against Outremer (and anyone else's) expansion and either fought or intimidated everyone into leaving them alone, are the people of Takach.  Since their days in the Slave Wars, the descendants of the Janissaries have had a reputation as a highly efficient and effective military culture, related to the Cilindareans, but distinct.  The Takach are one of the very few truly hybrid cultures; intermarried Cilindareans and Janissaries who established a colony away from the Cilindarean Arm per se, where they could create their own society without the ethnic tension between the two groups.  Few of them have had more occasion to actually utilize their militancy in practice than the Takach in recent years, and they are showing that they are the equal to either tradition.  It's believed by some that the conquest and settlement of the Kingdom of Takach, which was highly publicized and romanticized by many, was the inspiration for Kar Tanus to go liberate Thanatos and build his small empire in the first place.  Having fought frequently against Imperials, Cilindareans, Reavers, Revanchists, and more, the Takach military is seen as one of the best small militaries in known space.

I don't think I want to change that, although as I do more "light green" in the future, I want to get away a bit from making them all Janissary-derived. What else do I want to do with the Takach people? When I wrote that, I hadn't yet conceived of the Takach Nebula, so-called because the Takach Kingdom is smack dab in the middle of it. I did notice, however, that it is surrounded by rivals on all fronts; reachable from no fewer than three Seraean colonies, Desai worlds, two different Bernese worlds, a Cilindarean world proper, a Republic colony, Reaver worlds, and trucculent independents like Oerken all within a jump or two distance, and all known for their either expansionist or raiding history.

That doesn't mean that open warfare with any of them has ever been part of Takach's history. Nobody really goes to open war against the Reavers, just like you can't go to open war against pirates or bandits, and the Persians and Greeks were never able to successfully prosecute open warfare against the Scythians. The Bernese are usually somewhat friendly, although not entirely so, of course, and they did conquer and settle a wide variety of worlds in generations past in this area, but not so long ago that the Takach wouldn't remember it. The Republic are, of course, passive-aggressive and untrustworthy, but open warfare isn't usually their syle either. And the Seraeans have usually deliberately avoided provoking open warfare with them; the Seraean conquerors and settlers are not representative or backed by the Imperial might overall, so they were on the lookout for softer targets in which to establish their new kingdoms and states.

Nevertheless, I've pointed out before that the whole region is a powderkeg waiting to blow; one filled with many would-be Gavrilo Princips, and many could-be Franz Ferdinands. I'm actually also going to decide that the founding of Temple comes from the Takach Kingdom. In fact, I'm going so far as to say that the leader of the Temple is first cousin to the king of Takach, the brother of the father of the current king being the one who left Takach and formed Temple. However, Temple is not a Takach endeavor, and many people of many ethnicities are accountable to Temple. However, the leader of Temple and the king of Takach have an understanding of some kind, and the king of Takach is one of the few outsiders who is aware of Temple's existance. But I do like the idea that maybe the Takach people have more invested in stability in peace in the region than anyone else, not being subject in any way to any larger state like the Empire, the Republic or the Monarchy, and they work to try and maintain it maybe just a bit harder than most.

Thursday, February 11, 2021

SWTOR update 3.0

I don't know why I'm keeping a running journal of my Old Republic progress here lately, but cut me some slack; I'm enoying it immensely again after—while still playing it—having kind of run against a wall of tedium. It all boiled down to deciding that I didn't have to do it all. I crashed early last night, very sleepy after a bad night the night before, but that had a good effect. I didn't do everything that I thought I would, but I did all but one of my characters grind in the rakghoul tunnels. I woke up early enough to do that last one again before the day reset (I'm in Eastern time zone, so it resets at 7:00 AM my time.) That took me a little longer than I thought, and only a few minutes after I finished, 7:00 AM hit and it reset. I've since done two of my three characters again; the smuggler (who's otherwise retired from active duty, and I keep around for grinding purposes) and agent. After doing the smuggler, I had enough money to try and buy the armor set on the GTN I was saving for, but all of the cheaper copies had sold, and not only could I not afford it, but I wasn't even close anymore. I bought another similar set for even less, however—the helmet wasn't quite as good, but the chest piece was better. (I have a level 10+ legacy bound helmet that was very much like the one I couldn't buy.) There's one more armor set that I really want, the Mandalorian tracker. It sells for 25-30 million on the GTN, and 1440 on the Cartel Market. But I have no interest in using real money to buy this; I will either need to wait until I get my subscriber + security key cartel coins and have enough to buy it, or keep grinding with the smuggler until I get enough credits to buy it. That's not as unreasonable as it sounds, but it does mean spending at least an hour a day grinding—which might get tedious.

After I did the agent, I went back and did Quesh with him. The class story on the planet is shockingly short. I had to start the planetary story just to take the stupid shuttle from the orbital station to the surface, but then I could abandon that quest and move on. So freeing! I did it in about 20-30 minutes, because it's so short, and then moved on to Hoth. I'll finally get my agent's love interest (the one that I can stand to romance, anyway—my character already met her, but I can't change her race and image until I get her as a companion, of course.) For what it's worth, while the character model is a black woman (and prettier than most real life black women I've ever seen) the voice actress is a white Australian. She's blonde, but her hair color probably isn't natural. In fact, the customization 9 that I'm going to use as soon as I get her as a companion, probably looks a lot like the voice actress herself does. Or did, a good 10-15 years ago, anyway, with her natural hair color and natural brown eyes. Anyway, I've said before that I don't really like the agent's companions much, but Dr. Lokin is kind of interesting as a mad scientistic Dr. Jekyll of sorts, and Raina Temple is extremely cute, charismatic and likable.

Tonight, I want to: 

  1. Finish the Hoth class story with my agent.
  2. Grind the rakghoul tunnels with my Jedi Knight and Sith Warrior. 
  3. Do the Esseles Flashpoint with my Jedi Consular
  4. If I still have time, do the Coruscant Heroics with my Consular
  5. If I still have time, grind a few more heroics with my smuggler for money and for the chance to get the Remnant Underworld Trooper body armor piece, the only part of the remnant armors that I still really want to make sure I can find. I actually got quite a few crates that I need to open with all my smuggler grinding yesterday, but I haven't opened them.
But I don't know how much time I'll have tonight; I need to get out for a couple of hours in the evening. This weekend, I'm going out of town for my niece's baptism, so I won't play much. But when I come back, I'll only have a little bit of the rakghoul event to do before the timer runs out on it, so that'll be done. I'll keep grinding a bit more credits and see if it's feasible to actually buy the Mandalorian tracker armor with credits, or if I'll find the whole thing too tedious to keep working on. It's more money than I've ever spent on anything before; I don't think I've spent more than 5 million credits on anything before. But, of course, I'll be getting money just from my day to day progress through the story with my characters too.

I don't expect to be able to afford it, but the only other cosmetic right now that I really crave is the executioner's lightning weapon tuning, which I'd probably put on literally every weapon for every character for a while. But those are super expensive, and I'm not spending real money on that either.

Even with this accelerated schedule, I don't expect to finish the agent storyline completely next week, although I'll probably be close. And I'm going to play the consular with just world stories and maybe Tython and Coruscant repeated daily heroics to keep my level up, if I feel I need to, just to see how well that works in terms of leveling. I'll probably also do the story flashpoints with him; I'll hopefully do Esseles tonight, but also the two Maelstrom Prison/Revan ones later on, and maybe the Directive 7 one again too.

I'd also really like to do the War for Iokath story stuff on my Jedi Knight next week so I can start grinding those dailies. There's two reputation tracks to level up, one for Empire and one for Republic, but since you're the Alliance Commander, one character can do both of them (although you can only do the story track as one, and you get a headstart on the reputation that way.) Both of them have armor sets that I want, one of them I intend to use the majority of as the basis for my recorded Sith Warrior play through.

Wednesday, February 10, 2021

SWTOR Update 2.0

I put some stuff in the comments, but let me spell it out a bit better here. After I made that post, I made quite a bit more progress. I decided to skip the flashpoint Directive 7 with my smuggler, as well as the planetary story on Corellia, so I was able to finish the class story quite easily last night. In fact, after I did so, I started up my Jedi Consular and did all of Tython (there isn't really class and planetary stories for the first planets, which are really kinda like half-planets in scale.) I ate the XP boosts that I got, and I landed on the fleet at level 15. I don't know for sure if that's "normal", but I'll pay better attention to that as I start the next three classes that I have left to do. It'll make some difference when I'm doing my recording bid; what I'd like to do is have a single look that I take throughout the entire "show." However, given that some of my favorite cosmetic items are from the high level heroic crates, you can't wear them until you're 10th level at the least. I have a handful of items that I can't wear until I'm 15th. But being able to hit the fleet and update my look makes some sense, I suppose. I'll have a few other things get update in the look of the game as time goes on; I'm thinking in particular of characters like Risha that you interact with quite a lot before she becomes your actual companion, and you can't update her look until she's your companion. The same is true for all of the companions, for that matter, but she's one that you have kickin' around on your ship for the entirety of the first chapter before she actually becomes your companion, which seems to be the longest run. 

A few other things are ones I want to pick up in the cartel bazaar, and they don't bind to your legacy, so you have to pick them up in person. So again, you can't get everything you want until you get to the fleet, and even then, it's best if you get to the fleet as level 10 at a minimum, and level 15 is even better.

There's a little bit of stuff I can do behind the scenes, like do the heroics on the starting planet over again and not record it, or something, before heading to the fleet. But more likely, I'll just add a little placard in the video as the character arrives on the fleet in post production editing saying that my characters have updated their equipment once they arrived on the fleet. But after that, I'd like to settle pretty much on one single outfit that I do all of the class story with.

However, because I'll also be recording planetary stories, exploration and heroic missions, and the bonus series, but keeping that separate from the main flow of the class stories, it would actually make sense to have a different outfit to do those in. It helps keep it separate from the class stories, and emphasizes that it's a different flow.

Anyway, I've had a super grindy day today so far, and probably will continue to do so into the night as I play a bit more. I thought I'd be grinding the rakghoul event, but I actually haven't very much; I've much more been grinding heroics as a last hurrah with my smuggler to make money to buy some stuff on the GTN. There are two cartel/GTN armor sets that I still want to get before I'm ready to do my recording (and granted, it's not like I'm only days or even weeks away from starting that; probably more like six weeks to two months, or maybe even more.) One I think I can buy on the GTN with the credits I've been grinding, if I can get almost a million more in the next little bit, but the other I'll have to use actual cartel coins for. I don't want to spend real money for that, so I'm glad I don't have too much of a hurry to get it; I should have my monthly subscriber and security key dumps in a few days, but I will need at least one more month of those, maybe two, to afford the armor set I want to to unlock it in collections.

Anyway, I think I can do the heroic grinding that I want still this evening before I'm done, and I think I can grind the three characters still through the rakghoul stuff. Then... I doubt I'll do the War for Iokath with my Jedi Knight, although that's a high priority, so I'll probably just start doing some Agent stuff. Because my agent is almost max level, I'm actually thinking that I can leave off of the planetary stories and exploration and heroic missions. So, with any luck I can do the class story for Quesh tonight without any issue.

Tuesday, February 09, 2021

SWTOR Progress report

1) My Jedi Knight still hasn't started the Iokath mission, which I had meant to do this last week. I did do some dailies with him on Makeb, but for whatever reason I find those among the most tedious dailies I've done so far (to be fair, I haven't done all of them. I hear Iokath is pretty bad. Sadly, I really want some stuff that I need at least Champion reputation with Iokath on two separate tracks; Republic and Imperial, in order to get. I'll end up doing a lot of Iokath dailies, eventually.

2) My Sith Warrior finished Rishi and went to Yavin 4. But I haven't done much with him there yet. There are dailies there too, which I remember thinking were kind of tedious, but I didn't do much of them with the Jedi Knight earlier. Luckily, getting the Yavin 4 reputation up is a lower priority. I don't think there's anything from them that I really want a lot except maybe a dye module schematic for dark red and black or something. The opposite of the Oricon schematic that I already have. I'd like to finish Oricon. I've got everything that I really want from them, but I'd like to bump them up to Legendary, since I'm already at Champion. I'm also using the Sith Warrior as my main vehicle to get my Czerka dailies done so I can get that crazy Champion level sword.

3) My smuggler is almost done. I have the Directive 7 flashpoint, which I could miss if I wanted to since I've already seen it from both the Republic and Imperial sides, and it's basically identical anyway. I've done that flashpoint, I think, four times already. After that, he's got Corellia, and then I'm done with him. I don't intend to use him to do any expansion content, I don't think.

4) My agent just finished Taris, which is the first planet of chapter 2. He's got the early Revan flashpoints to do, and then on to Quesh, and Hoth, where I'll finally pick up my love interest (I cannot tell you how much I despise Kaliyo Djannis. Too bad for the voice actress, who did a good job with the character, that the character is so poorly written and conceived. It's not her fault.) I also finally got a companion that I kind of like, Dr. Lokin. He "hulks out" into a rakghoul, but I think only if you have him on either tank or damage spec, and I almost always keep my companions on heal spec. Oh, well. The companions for this class are really just terrible until very close to the end, which is a real shame. Otherwise, it probably has one of the most interesting class stories of all of the classes, although it's arguably not quite as iconically Star Wars as some, being more of a James Bond or Mission Impossible or Jason Bourne style thriller series.

5) In any case, all of that is kind of on hold. This week is the Rakghoul Event, and I'm going to focus on getting as much rakghoul stuff done as I can while it's active. I've done the dailies (and the two weeklies) already with my agent, and I'm almost at Champion rank. I'll do the other three main characters today too, and I should be well on my way towards Legend rank, as well as having some rakghoul canisters to spend with the reputation vendors—although there isn't anything that I'm really burning to buy. The stuff that I most wanted, I've already bought; the rakghoul lightsaber crystals (black core, awesome green halo), two of the lightsabers (for my upcoming Jedi Sentinel that I'll be video recording), and the black/orange THORN suit. Anyhoo, I don't know how much story progress I'll make with any of my classes this week, or how much progress with any other dailies, because I want to really burn up the rakghoul stuff while I can. I presume this works for all of the reputation tokens, but I know for sure that it does for the rakghoul, because I did it last time—if you hit your weekly maximum, you just get the tokens in your inventory and can then spend them the next week. Even if I hit my weekly maximum before getting to Legend, which I am certain that I will, I can amass enough reputation tokens to get up to Legend rank, probably. And if I don't get all the way there to Legend status; well, the rakghoul event comes up pretty often. Every six weeks or so, probably?

6) After the rakghoul event this week, there's a week off and then the bounty hunter event runs. I haven't done much with this one, but I want to really hit it hard this time around, and do loads of bounty hunter missions. There's some cool stuff I want from this, but not urgently. I'd like some of the bowcasters as blaster rifle substitutes, and if I ever finish the HK-51 quest and get him as a companion for anyone, I'd want to use the Legend rank bounty hunter customization. And there's a dye module schematic that I'd like. The brown/red one, obviously—not the white and bubble gum pink one. I presume after that we'll get the Dantooine pirates again sometime in March since that one seems due again, and then the Gree. Swoop bikes just ended a week ago, so I presume that's the last of the recurring events to come back up again. I haven't really paid too close attention to the recurring events, although I did spend a fair amount of time doing Dantooine pirates once, and rakghoul once. Dantooine I mostly did just because it was the first recurring event that I participated in. I'd like to spend a little bit of time on it again, get the Nova Blade jacket as a possible outfit for one of my recording characters, and the kath hound mount. Maybe the ugnaught companion. When I do my second agent, I want to be better prepared with alternate companions; the ugnaught, the ewok and maybe HK-51, or something (can I transfer HK-51 to another character that didn't earn him? I'll need to check.)

But in general, I'm just a bit wary about being caught up too much in reputation track dailies. It can get tedious if you do too much of it back to back, and it doesn't advance anything on the story. Because I have particular story goals that I want to do, the dailies should be something that most of the time I keep just a bit more on the back burner. 

7) As it's likely that I'll finish the smuggler class story sometime this week, or if not, shortly into next week, I'll start my Jedi Consular story next in my continued leapfrogging. That'll happen pretty shortly, and I'll be on my way towards a fifth character story completion. I may skip the majority of the Heroic, exploration and even planetary story missions this time around, just to get through it all faster. When the agent gets done, a bit further down the pike, the second sith class, the assassin, will be next. Bounty hunter and trooper will be the last two.

Monday, February 08, 2021

Lapplanders are not indigenous to the Scandinavian High Arctic

If you read Wikipedia, it will tell you that the Lapplanders, or Sami is it is now more politically correct to call them, are the indigenous peoples of northern Fennoscandia. They are recognized and protected by "international conventions of indigenous peoples", whatever exactly that means. However, the arrival of the Uralic languages to the Fennoscandian region is now pretty well documented thanks to archaeogenetic research, and it is highly correlated with the N1 Y-DNA haplogroups, more specifically N-L1026. This appears to have originated far to the east, in the Krasnoyarsk region of Siberia, and the earliest arrivals of it to the Fennoscandia region include sample 0LS10, from a tarand grave in what is now Estonia from the Iron Age, and possibly two samples from the Bolshoi Oleni Ostrov culture in stone cist or ship graves of the Middle Bronze Age far to the north of the Kola Peninsula. The last two are a bit intriguing, because they predate what most everyone in the field suggests was possible for the dating of the Uralic spread. But from a genetic perspective, they seem to be everything that one would want from Uralic ancestors of the Lapplanders. Except, of course, they aren't indigenous. They are, in fact, considerably later arrivals than the Nordic Bronze Age, which is considered directly ancestral to the modern Swedish-Danish-Norwegian etc. population. And the Nordic Bronze Age is directly descended from the Corded Ware variant, the Battle Age culture, mediated by incursions from the Bell Beakers. This goes back a good thousand years before the arrival of anyone who could be considered an ancestor of the Lapplanders. The Indo-European, "Viking" Scandinavians have about a thousand year jump on the Lapplanders with a claim to be "indigengous." Of course, there were people there before the arrival of the Corded Ware. Some Neolithic farmers like the Funnelbeakers had expanded over the southern extent of this region, including the Danish peninsula and the southern shores of the Baltic.

If anyone has a claim of being the indigenous peoples of Fennoscandia, it's the hunter-gatherer traditions of the Ertebølle-Ellerbek culture, the Narva culture, and the last lingering hunter-gatherer culture which coexisted with both Funnelbeakers and Corded Ware, the Pit-Comb Ware culture. In the past, that was assumed to have been associated with Uralic speakers, but that view is untenable given what we now know about Uralic from a linguistic and genetic perspective. Most likely, they belonged to Scandinavian hunter-gatherer groups that are linguistically and culturally gone now; some kind of paleo-European language that has been replaced by the descendants of Corded Ware or Finnic languages, or Baltic and Slavic languages in some places. Genetically they didn't really disappear, they simply merged with the Nordic Bronze Age, and even today hunter-gatherer haplogroups like I2 which go back to old Ertebølle genetics, like those unearthed at Motala, are still common in Scandinavia. And from there, you can find clues of continuity all the way back to the peopling of the region in the Upper Paleolithic after the retreat of the glaciers.

Now, to be fair, the Lapplander and Finnic peoples may be among the latest arrivals (not counting the Middle easterners who have come in just the last generation or two) rather than the indigenous ones, but from a genetic perspective, none of them are exactly "pure" Uralic. The phenotype and genetic profile of these early Uralic speakers would have greatly resembled the Nganasan peoples of a bit further east on the Taymyr Peninsula today. But because Finns and Lapplanders both have tons of "Viking" DNA from the descendants of the Corded Ware Pit-Comb Ware hybrid that made up the Nordic Bronze Age, they seem very similar to them in both genetics and phenotype today; speaking simply a completely unrelated language, having some unusual customs, and having lingering unusual haplogroups. As well as very occasionally some exotic physical features like modest epicanthic folding and whatnot. But even in the Bronze, Iron and Medieval era DNA studies, you can see this shift happening, as the late arriving "Uralic" DNA was gradually swamped by the actual indigenous people who lived here already; the descendents of the Corded Ware and Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers who make up the populations of the Baltic and Scandinavian cultures today.

Friday, February 05, 2021

Voter fraud is not a fairy tale

Boomer music that isn't so bad

To add more texture to yesterday's post, I don't hate all Boomer music. I don't even hate the Beatles, who are the most emblematic of Boomer music. In fact, I kinda like a lot of the Beatles songs, especially from the earlier years before they got super hippified.

But the "older" music, and by older I mean before my time (since I remember the mid-70s through the 80s, that doesn't count) that I quite like is not associated in any way with the counterculture movement, and mostly predates it. The chronologically latest that I really like is the California sound, or surf rock stuff, as best represented by The Beach Boys and Jan & Dean. I also quite like stuff like the Everly Brothers, some of the doo-wop songs—even though that was mostly made by black people or Italian immigrants rather than Heritage Americans, so arguably isn't really "our" music.

One of the things that I love about the California sound, is that it is emblematic of an America that has been stolen from us. You listen to some of that stuff, even the corny songs like "Be True to Your School" and it just makes your heart ache and yearn for that lifestyle that we can't have anymore. This goes back to my hypothesis that there is more nostalgia towards this type of music, and 80s music, then there is for the counterculture anthems of the Boomers from the later 60s and the 70s, because they represent a time when America was confident in itself, largely uncorrupted by foreign influence of those who hate and resent Western civilization and want to see it torn down, deconstructed, and looted and taken from those who built it. And we should all just should die off, by the way. Arrgh! Who could have thought when the Beach Boys were singing about the joys of high school, surfing and cars that a movement that wanted to destroy all of that was right on the horizon?

That's what I hate. The arrogant, smug, self-righteous narcissism of the Boomers. I couldn't articulate that in the 80s when I was a teenager, because I was still swimming in the sea of blue pills that we tend to be surrounded with in our culture, but the counter culture music usually turned me off big time. And to help with that, my dad didn't really listen to much of it either, so my exposure to it was limited. I still haven't heard more than two or three Rolling Stones songs even now, for instance. I heard the Kinks because I actually went out and bought one of their discount cassette tapes in the 80s. Mostly just so I could hear "You Really Got Me" which is still the only song of theirs that I care for at all. I didn't hear Clapton or the Doors or anything like that except incidentally here and there. My dad was a Beatles fan, but even he checked out when they got too deeply into their hippy phase, and I think the latest Beatles album he had was either Help! or Hard Day's Night. Rubber Soul was his favorite of theirs. 

Curiously, in spite of my rather pointed disinterest in the British Invasion and the pop culture influence that came with it, I had the exact opposite reaction to the Second British Invasion of the 80s, based on synthesizer new wave bands, mostly, but even getting into hair metal and rock like Def Leppard, Billy Idol or Robert Palmer, and settling down into regular 80s pop outfits like The Outfield, The Police, Simple Minds, etc. Of course, those acts, while not necessarly overtly political or social (and often representing things that were anti-western civilization when they were asked) did, in a way, represent a normalization of counter-counter culture; a kind of reversion to something that rejected, and yet also made peace with some of the upheavals of the counter culture crap. Which is probably why they went down so much easier. As much as there was a lot of wrong-headedness in the 80s too, at least most of these bands knew who they were and weren't trying to hide from it or bemoan their nationalism, race, or birthright. The British bands of the second British Invasion were unapologetically British, for instance.

Thursday, February 04, 2021

Boomer Music goes Bye-Bye

Vox Day posted the original article with some commentary. I'll offer my own, with the caveat that since I agree with Signore Day on this issue, some of what I say will be similar to what he says.

Back in 1959, on the cusp of the Swinging Sixties, I was posted to Germany as part of my National Service and quickly found myself a new niche.

In those days, the Forces radio station played an endless diet of Bing Crosby and Peggy Lee — both wonderful singers, but their music was the sort of thing we young servicemen associated with our parents.

We wanted something different, something to call our own — and we'd found it in rock 'n' roll. 

It's an amusing note on the infamously tone deaf tin ears of the Boomers; what they expected for their generation, i.e., that they wanted something different from what their parents listened to, shouldn't be expected for their own children. In spite of his assertions later in the article, it's not my experience that Generations Jones, X, Y, Millennial, etc. really care very much about Boomer music or hold it in high regard other than repeating like parrots the assertions that their parents make uncritically about, say, the Beatles. 

This was the dawn of two decades which would usher in some of the greatest music ever made and the greatest lyrics ever penned — written and performed by bands and solo artists whose names are now etched in the music hall of fame.

From Elvis and the Beatles to the Rolling Stones and The Who, Bob Dylan and the Kinks, Rod Stewart, Eric Clapton, Elton John, Queen — the music that emerged from that era has more than stood the test of time and is loved by baby boomers and their grandchildren alike.

Yet not, it seems, by the bigwigs at Radio 2.

As the Mail reported yesterday, it appears that they have quietly asked their DJs to 'scale back' on playing songs from the Sixties and Seventies in favour of music from the Eighties onwards.

Or we can make a much more likely and parsimonious null hypothesis—Boomer music wasn't some of the greatest music ever made and the greatest lyrics ever penned, and the music hall of fame should be capitalized, because it's not something generic. It's a specific organization made by Boomers to celebrate their own generation. And that the children and grandchildren of the boomers don't love the music of the boomers and are demanding something different, just as the Boomers did before them. As a Generation Xer who was born in the early 70s, I have to admit that starting the roll call with the 80s, the music when I came of age and thus "my" music, is a good choice. But it's a good choice for me because that's my generation. I'm not so narcissistic as to think that everyone from every generation loves the stuff from my generation the same way I do.

It's my own observation, biased though it may be, that the 80s is the music that the Millennials and Gen-Z people are more likely to respond to if they need to listen to older music. Just as the 50s was what we listened to in the 80s if we wanted older music, or at best the early 60s before the Boomer hippy revolution ruined pop culture and just culture culture overall in the West. The 80s and the 50s, especially in America but also in Britain (especially for the 80s) were a time of national pride, patriotism and love of our peoples and our cultures. A last gasp before the Satanic claws of globalism and liberalism (really Marxism and foreign influences generally) tried to forcefully separate us from our own heritage. The 50s and the 80s were periods in which the forces conspiring against us were much more on the ropes than they are currently, or during the second half of the 60s and most of the 70s.

But it's another observation of mine that in general, nothing can get past the hard-coded self-esteem that the Boomers have, and their confidence that they truly are the most specialest generation that ever was ever in the history of the human race. Observation and data are hardly likely to convince boomers that nobody actually wants to hear their music other than themselves, and nobody really thinks very highly of their "contribution" to our current situation. Arrogant, spiteful narcissists that they are.

Curiously, this video is no longer available on Youtube. Used to be. And if you followed the link to the original Daily Mail article, have you ever read a boomer screed that didn't boil down to "What about meeeeee!!!!?????"

Wednesday, February 03, 2021

Old Republic status report

Yesterday, I finished Knights of the Eternal Throne, the fourth major story expansion to Old Republic with my Jedi Knight character. It's the same for all characters, mostly, so I have little incentive to be too much in a hurry to run someone else through it. I do want to eventually run at least my Sith Warrior through it though, because some of the Onslaught content differs by faction again. There's still a fair bit of content to do for this character, including Iokath, three story mode flashpoints, Ossus, and then all of the Onslaught drip feed stuff, which is not insignificant too. One thing that I've heard which is notable is that some of the later Onslaught material, especially the Echoes of Oblivion stuff offers major spoilers for the Jedi Knight, Jedi Consular and Sith Warrior classes. I've played the main story for Knight and Warrior, but not yet Consular. I'll want to do that first. Luckily, it's the next one that I'm scheduled to start. 

My Sith Warrior lags a bit behind the Jedi Knight, but I just finished all of the Rishi content, so I'm hip deep in the Shadow of Revan expansion. I'm also using him specifically to be my reputation grinder. I have two factions at legendary now, two I believe at Champion (the next to last, below Legendary) and four or five at Hero. The ones that tend to lag are the ones that are based on the events, since I can't just do them whenever. Those, if I'm interested in unlocking something on the track, I throw more characters at anyway. But I'm a little leery of starting Knights of the Fallen Empire with him too soon, because I'm using him for stuff right now anyway. And, there's no hurry; I literally just did Knights of the Fallen Empire and Knights of the Eternal Throne with my Jedi Knight, and the story is the same with any class.

My smuggler is approaching the end of his story, kinda. I just arrived on Voss, so I just have that planet, plus the Directive 7 flashpoint, and then Corelia to be done. I don't know that I'll go any further than the end of the main story with any of the subsequent characters of this batch. Probably not, actually.

My agent is on Alderaan. I just finished the class story and the world story and after doing the bonus story missions, I'll leave that one behind (although I think next week is the rakghoul event on Alderaan. So I'll probably have plenty of characters on that planet again next week. I liked it better on Tatooine, honestly. It somehow seemed to fit that planet better.) After finishing the Alderaan bonus missions, he's got the chapter 1 capper events and he moves into Chapter 2. We're gettting there!

After I finish the smuggler, I'll start the Jedi Consular, and I'll want to finish that story before I get to the end of the more recent Onslaught updates like Echoes of Oblivion, at least. Mark (or M'aar'k, more accurately, or however I had to spell it to get the stupid game to take the name), my Jedi Knight, will therefore go a bit into hibernation, and I'll only use him for the two upcoming events; the rakghoul and the bounty hunting event, both of which I want to max out my weekly reputation for my legacy on, and I'd like to earn plenty of the currency that both give for buying some special items.

After I finish the agent, which will be sometime after finishing the smuggler but before finishing the consular, I'll add the sith inquisitor to the rotation to replace him. And sometime soon, my bounty hunter and trooper rotations will go into effect too, and then I'll be a Legendary Player who's finished all eight class stories. Then I'll mop up the expansions and be done.

But wait! After I'm done, I'm actually going to do it all again! See, each class has two variants. Back in the day, you started a class and then at some point picked an "advanced" class that changed some of your combat mechanics. Now, you pick that right at the very beginning and character generation. The story between the two variants for each class is identical—there's a cosmetic change (what type of weapon you use) and many of the combat mechanics will differ somewhat. So why do it? Just for the combat mechanics? No, actually I'm going to record and then edit movies of this second playthrough, to archive for the day when inevitably the game goes offline and you can never play it again anymore. Sure, I could probably watch someone else's youtube playthrough. There's plenty of good options. But I want to "cast my own protagonist" so to speak, and play through with a character whos' appearance I've designed and make the dialogue choices, insignificant as most of them are, that I want to pick. Plus, I'm having fun figuring out how to do the video recording and editing; it's not something that I've done much with before, so it's a new hobby of sorts within the greater hobby of playing SWTOR.

Along those lines, although the world stories, the bonus stories, the exploration missions and the heroic missions are all fine, I do find that they interrupt and disrupt the pacing and flow of the class stories. As I play this, I'll end up editing it in such a way that it'll focus on the class stories, and the world stories, exploration missions and whatnot will be "supplemental content". I'll upload all this stuff to Youtube, I presume, once I've finished editing them, but the main playlists will be the class stories only. Also, because the world stories, exploration missions, bonus series and heroic missions are all the exact same across the entire faction, I probably will not bother editing and uploading the material for every class; probably one per faction only.

I will also be only doing solo content, at least at this point. Anything that requires grouping will not be played. This means that the operations that end the Oricon planet won't be showing, and several of the non-essential flashpoints. I also won't be doing the macrobinoculars and seeker droid missions, because they end on group content that can't be completed without a group. It's a real shame, because you can do a lot of stuff solo, but you can't quite finish it. It was clear that during the Rise of the Hutt Cartel expansion era the devs were really trying to push group content on the player base, but the reality is that most people don't play group content (I think this is likely common to most online games, actually—the old World of Warcraft MMO model is one that's pretty much gone now in most respects, and the lack of solo player modes for games like Destiny, Overwatch, Star Wars Battlefront, etc. have been points against the game for much of the player base. Regardless of what other games are doing, the devs for SWTOR have confirmed that this is the case for SWTOR, and after that expansion era ended, the subsequent expansions focused heavily on solo play. I'd love to see the last flashpoints and the Oricon operation, a least (since it's a story one) as well as the Heroic 4s for the end of the macrobinocular and seeker droid missions retooled as soloable content. Leaving the rest of operations as group stuff (plus uprisings and other group content) should keep the groupers happy with at least the same level of content that they have now, and hopefully more as more content continues to be added, but the solo players are missing out on a few items here and there that are actually necessary to get the entire story. Honestly, we could leave the rest of the non-essential flashpoints as grouper only, but I wish that they wouldn't. Most of them should be fine with a combat droid and some extremely minor tweaks to the enemies.

Anyway, that's neither here nor there, since I can't control what the devs add or don't add to the game. For purposes of my recording of the game, I'm only doing the solo content.

Tuesday, February 02, 2021

Ancestry

I've talked a bit here and there about my Germanic and Celtic ancestry, which is seven-eighths of my ancestry; the typical British type, which is a combination of Anglo-Saxon over a Brythonic substrate and some overt Scottish mixed in as well from more than one line. I don't talk very much about the last one-eighth of my ancestry, which is Portuguese, specifically from a group of Portuguese Protestant converts who came to America to escape Catholic persecution from the Island of Madeira. Madeira has no aboriginal inhabitants, so the Portuguese were the first settlers, and most of them come from the Minho region. Looking back on my family tree, most of the lines dead end before getting back to the Portuguese mainland, but I do indeed find one line from Aveiro (which is farther south than the Minho region) and the oldest who has a geography associated with him was one Gonçalo Gomes Ferraz, born in 1320 in Porto, formerly Portus Cale, or Portucale, supposedly the origin of the name of Portugal itself, and a regional capital of the Minho region since before Roman times. I can actually go a bit further back; the earliest Portuguese ancestor I can identify is Martim Ferraz, born in 1210, but there is no associated location with anyone earlier than Gonçalo. 

Curiously, since I contrast this with the Celtic and Germanic portion of my heritage, this region was from prehistoric times a bastion of Celtiberian influence, and part of the territory of Gallaecia, named for the Gallaecian Celtic tribes. (Although semi-legendary, this interpretation isn't crazy, and oral histories suggest that the Gaels of Scotland and Ireland come originally from this area.) Of course, after the Punic Wars, all of the Iberian Peninsula was annexed by the Romans and remained as part of their empire for about half a millenium. After this ~500 years, as the Roman Empire started to lose its fringe territories to barbarians, the Hispanic areas were invaded by the Suebians, the Vandals and the Alans. The portion where my ancestors come from was settled by the Suebians, and their kingdom of Suebian Gallaecia lasted until the Moorish conquest. It was also one of the fairly early areas to be liberated from the Moors, and became part of the Visigothic (or post Visigothic, most likely) Kingdom of Asturias. Mostly the Vandals and Alans were in central and southern Hispania, although the Suebian kings did end up conquering much of the Iberian peninsula at one point. Briefly. 

It's curious that while I tend to think of my Portuguese ancestry as contrasted with my Germanic and Celtic ancestry, the region from which my Portuguese ancestors come from is mostly known for its Celtic and Germanic inhabitants. Although it's unclear to what degree they were Romanized; certainly they were done so linguistically, probably very culturally (at least before the Middle Ages) and the real question is how much were they Romanized genetically, of course. And especially during the Suebian and later Visigothic Asturian reigns, there was probably a significant difference between the kings and nobles and the common people both culturally and genetically. Nobody argues that Portuguese people tend to look significantly different than British people, and the mixture of ancient populations in different proportions is probably the cause. North Spanish, which is the closest I can find for the Asturias/Minho region are about 60% Neolithic farmer ancestry, 30% steppe herder ancestry and 10% Mesolithic hunter gatherer ancestry. The English ratios, in the same order, are on average 45%, 41% and 14%, while the Scottish are 28%, 49% and 23%. "Regular" Spanish is 77%, 23% and 0%. That's the highest farmer ancestry proportion in Europe of the samples shown, with the exception of the Sardinians, who are 88%, 5% and 7%. The southern European "Mediterranean" phenotype is clearly almost the same as it was in the Neolithic, while much of the northern European "Nordic" look comes from the combination of the steppe herders and the earlier Scandinavian hunter-gatherers, who have proportionally much smaller admixtures of farmer DNA. In any case, my Portuguese ancestry is probably much heavier in farmer DNA than my British and Scottish, and my father, who was only one-fourth Portuguese himself, still had a very Portuguese-like phenotype himself. I don't; I'm taller, whiter, have brown rather than black hair and green or hazel rather than brown eyes.

Now keep in mind, I'm not saying that farmer DNA is bad DNA or anything. Just that it's usually pretty detectable, or at least you can posit with some certainty that someone has a fair bit of it, just by looking at them, and I don't look like that. But even the British and Scottish have a not insignificant percentage of farmer DNA mixed in. Most likely from wives taken from the Globular Amphora or other post Funnelbeaker culture peoples by invading steppe herders in the Eneolithic and early Bronze Age. And keep in mind that no population today has a really significant enough chunk of hunter-gatherer DNA to sport their likely phenotype. The Estonians have the highest proportion of any recorded modern population, 37%, but most have a quarter or less. 

In any case, in spite of my specific British Anglo-Scottish ancestry, or the specifics of my very specific Portuguese ancestry, I'm clearly a product of Western Civilization. And that is a three-legged construct, which includes 1) the Classical Graeco-Roman traditions, 2) the Germanic (and to a lesser extent Celtic) traditions of the barbarians, and 3) Christianity. I sometimes replace number 2 on that list with the specific developments that occured within the Hajnal Line, but realistically, that ends up being a slightly smaller subset of the number 2 that I quoted anyway. 

Wednesday, January 27, 2021

Imposter syndrome

 It's a short post, so I'll quote it in it's entirety. From Vox's blog:

"The secret of the elites is that they're not all that smart so they need the deck stacked to continue the illusion that they are elite at all."

- Rob Peffer

He's absolutely right. That's why the fake elite devotes 100 percent of their collective effort to trying to maintain the illusion and keep the deck stacked. It's also why nationalism and populism terrify them. They know their power and influence could be broken literally overnight by a sufficiently angry populace.

This is no longer about ideology. All the idearrhea about "liberal" and "conservative" and "communism" and "objectivism" is a veil to obscure the realities of the stacked deck. It's about lawless rule by a small, mostly foreign and self-appointed fake elite. They all have imposter syndrome because they are all imposters.

The Emperor has no clothes. The great and powerful wizard is just a frumpy man behind a curtain. Whatever culturally appropriate metaphor you prefer, it describes those who rule over us. Because our culture is high trust and we dislike rentier jobs, we pretty much just let them come in and remake our legal and political and even social framework right before our eyes, never suspecting that they were doing something so malicious and destructive. But, they were. And they did. And to paraphrase that Japanese general, the sleeping giant is waking up. The only real question is what will happen next? 

Monday, January 18, 2021

PIE spread

 An interesting map from the following paper.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-prehistoric-society/article/abs/forgotten-child-of-the-wider-corded-ware-family-russian-fatyanovo-culture-in-context/6309A60F638130BF6F7FD96135AA1B37#

There's one exception I'd make to the bottom map, though. It seems most possible that Yamnaya originated in the Western steppe, not the eastern steppe. The genetic evidence, according to Eurogenes, seems to suggest this, although there are other hints that it may have started in the east, as an outgrowth of Repin and Khvalynsk. Davidski suggests that post-Sredni Stog rolled over Khvalynsk, and that genetics can prove it, to create Yamnaya, and that early Corded Ware was genetically identical to Yamnaya. Later Corded Ware cultures picked up more admixture from native European hunter-gatherer and farmer ancestries.

In any case, the map doesn't feature time depth, though. Or rather, the second one adds some time depth. Keep in mind that Fatyanovo-Balanovo and Abashevo coexisted with the more westerly Corded Ware, and is usually considered a farther eastern extension of them. Sintashta has roots in Abashevo, but is considered a separate development. Andronovo is generally considered the eastern steppe explosion of Sintashta into territory that used to be the non-Indo-European Botai-Tersek culture earlier. Although granted, the Kazakhstan archaeological picture is a bit hazy because much more fieldwork is required.

Friday, January 15, 2021

Linguistic PIE

I'll repost the same image I did yesterday, but in a slightly bigger format (although the image is the same; if you click on it, you get the same sized version), and then talk about it and the article I mentioned yesterday, with it's working theories.

Let's reiterate, shall we? There are several known branches of Indo-European that we know enough about to classify (as well as several other languages that we don't know enough about to classify because they were parahistorical; going extinct without ever being written down in more than a few words, phrases, names or glosses, but were mentioned by literate neighbors like the Greeks or the Romans.) These branches are:

  1. Anatolian
  2. Tocharian
  3. Albanian (from Illyrian?)
  4. Celto-Italic (later branching into Celtic and Italic specifically)
  5. Greco-Armenian (later branching into Greek and Armenian. May have included Phrygian as well.)
  6. Germanic
  7. Balto-Slavic (later branching into Baltic and Slavic branches)
  8. Indo-Iranian, later branching into Indic and Iranian branches)
The chronological branching off of groups from a unified Proto-Indo-European (PIE) has created a confusing mass of modified titles; archaic PIE, common PIE, Indo-Hittite, etc. Koch divides PIE simply by numbers, and it is the following, as shown on the graphic:
  1. PIE 1 is the most archaic PIE, and includes all branches of the family.
  2. PIE 2 has had Anatolian split off, but includes Tocharian, Albanian, Italo-Celtic, Greco-Armenian, Germanic, Balto-Slavic and Indo-Iranian. According to Koch, this is the classic Pontic Steppes Indo-European.
  3. PIE 3 has Tocharian now split off as well, but still includes a Common Indo-European of Albanian, Italo-Celtic, Greco-Armenian, Germanic, Balto-Slavic, and Indo-Iranian. Archaeologically, this would be late Yamnaya or early Corded Ware, I presume?
  4. PIE 4 has now lost Albanian (odd, considering that it is located right in the center, or at least only a little to the south, of the Indo-European development central at this point.) It still contains Italo-Celtic, Greco-Armenian, Germanic, Balto-Slavic, and Indo-Iranian. This is supposed to take place before the Bell Beaker phenomena still.
  5. PIE 5 has now lost the Italo-Celtic branch, which is archaeologically visible as the rise of the Bell Beaker phenomena. Keep in mind, this isn't suggesting that the Bell Beakers spoke Italo-Celtic, merely that they started a process that introduced enough linguistic isolation from the rest of the Corded Ware and post-Corded Ware community that they would develop in the future into Italo-Celtic.
  6. PIE 6 has now spun off the Greco-Armenian branch, and is the last rump of "unified" Indo-European, being left with the Balto-Slavic and Indo-Iranian branches (and probably Thracian too, for that matter, since it appears to be a satem language.) The big innovations that belong to this phase include satemization and the ruki rule. I will point out, however, that the ruki rule is not limited to the languages Koch puts in PIE 6; it does seem to include Albanian and Armenian (possibly as an areal feature?) and there are odd exceptions in Slavic and Indo-Iranian. 
  7. You'll notice that Germanic floats above the branching structure and has dotted lines to PIE 4 and PIE 6. This is explained in the working hypotheses below.
Koch then offers a number of working hypotheses, which I'll summarize and discuss very briefly. There's at least one that I think is a poor syllogism, but since it's a faddish theory right now, it can't simply be dismissed without reviewing, I suppose.
  1. The Homeland of PIE 1 can't be the Pontic steppes, because Daamgaard's survey of the archaeogenetics of five supposed Hittite speakers have no trace of the Western Steppe Herder DNA component. Therefore, PIE 1 is to be located south of the Caucasus, and they somehow taught their language to the WSH's without transfering any of their DNA. As you can tell by my sarcastic tone, that is just as unlikely as the reasoning used to dismiss the kurgan theory for PIE 1 in the first place, if not actually a fair bit moreso. Not only that, as Davidski points out, there are good reasons for supposing that Daamgaard's "Hittites" were actually Hattians, who may well have spoken Hittite by this point, but weren't the people who brought the Anatolian branch to Anatolia. He also says that he detects a weak WSH signal in some samples from Bronze Age Anatolia, but admits that much more sampling is required to confirm this. In any case, this is exactly the wrong null hypothesis, because the exact same reasoning that suggests that PIE 1 can't have been spoken on the steppes means that it would be impossible to derive PIE 2 on the steppes from south of the Caucasus, since no recent Caucasian admixture is found in subsequent steppe populatons.
  2. PIE 2 is the classic WSH cultures; Yamnaya and related. Again, as we suggested above, you can't derive this from anything south of the Caucasus, so the more likey story is that an early branch of this like Usatovo is the source of the Anatolian split-off, and those that remained on the steppes still continued linguistic innovation as PIE 2. This is related to the question of Tocharian, because the imminent splitting off of Tocharian is the defining line between PIE 2 and PIE 3. Three related questions need good answers of yes to make this hypothesis correct:
    1. Are the Afansievo and Yamnaya populations genetically similar enough to derive one from the other? The answer here is a solid yes; Afanesievo seems to be genetically identical to Yamnaya.
    2. Is the link between Afanasievo and Tocharian secure? The answer here is no, but on the other hand, no other credible alternatives have ever emerged, so it remains the only null hypothesis by default.
    3. Was Tocharian the second branch to split off? While the mainstream view is certainly yes, there are a number of workers who dispute this and have introduced alternative explanations.
  3. The archaeological Beaker package arose among probably non-Indo-Europeans on the far western coasts of Europe, but was spread by a genetically somewhat heterogenous population of Indo-Europeans with Y-DNA haplogroups derived from the Single Grave Culture. The SGC was awhich was a far western Corded Ware variant and probably early Indo-European speaking phenomena. Early Beakers from Iberia show no WSH genetics, but strong continuity with the Neolithic in the area, although later Iberia was subsequently over-run with male line WSH beakers. The British Isles in particular seem to have had a massive turnover from the Neolithic population to the Beaker population; over 90% of its genetics in the from the Neolithic was replaced by genetics that are largely identical to Single Grave genetics in the Bronze Age. This genetic replacement in both regions, (and in others for that matter) was heavily mediated by male intrusions; much of the female lines appear to remain in some cases; in Iberia, almost entirely (in the British Isles, the female lines seem to be replaced as well.) As the beaker phenomena spread eastward, it encountered more established Corded Ware variants, and although there is interaction, there isn't replacement as there was in the British Isles and Iberia, which were presumably non-Indo-European prior to the Beaker intrusions. This whole process probably initiated a dialect or language split between the far Western Corded Ware linguistic continuum and the rest of the Corded Ware cultures, and the Beakers can be likely credited with created a new branch of Indo-European that now differed from the Corded Ware mainstream. This new dialect probably eventually emerged as Italo-Celtic and Germanic (see below.)
  4. This next one is complicated, and has two parts, but which work in harmony. The first is that the Old European hydronymy (river names), i.e., pre-Indo-European river names based on a recognizable root, is confined to the area outside of the Corded Ware culture distribution, suggesting that the Corded Ware is the spread of Indo-European into Europe, and that there was at one point a vast Corded Ware dialect continuum from the Low countries in the west to the Urals in the east, north of the Alps, which excluded what is today France, Iberia, the Italian area, the Balkans, Greece and the Aegean, etc. The Beaker phenomena later created a marked dialectical difference that led to different branches and separated this phenomena along a vaguely defined line running north-south through somewhere in Central Europe. The second part of this hypothesis is that the Germanic languages were initially more closely aligned with the Balto-Slavic group to their immediate East, but cultural conditions caused a "realignment" towards the western group, which gives them simultaneously notable correspondances with Italo-Celtic but also with Balto-Slavic. The genetics seem to bear this out too; the Germanic area shows a high degree of the classic Corded Ware R1a clade of Y-haplogroups (relatively speaking) but also shows a high degree of the classic Beaker clade of R1b. The Germanic area is somewhat unique in sporting both in relatively high pluralities, whereas throughout most of the rest of Europe one or the other dominates much more markedly. Missing from this working hypothesis, however, is any explanation of where the Balkan and post-Balkan languages fit in. While it describes Italic, Celtic, Germanic, Baltic Slavic (and leaves room for Indo-Iranian farther to the east, where it shows more signs of a continuum with Balto-Slavic), where does Albanian come from in this scenario? Or the Greco-Armenian group? To be fair, this is still a problem, and few people address it, prefering to see in the Corded Ware not necessarily the expansion of PIE 3 out of the steppes, but PIE 4 or 6. (This is nonsense that it would be so strictly limited, especially in the early Corded Ware period, since the Beaker phenomena is genetically an outgrowth of the westernmost Corded Ware group, the Single Grave culture, and nobody is saying that the Beaker folks are the ancestors exclusively of the Balto-Slavic and Germanic languages.) The origins of the paleo-Balkan languages are a mess, and most specialists seem to prefer to ignore it and focus on the more northern sphere, probably because it's easier to do, and probably because their own ancestry and linguistic heritage is to be found there. (I mean, even the Balkans today is mostly Slavic speaking, amirite?) As working models by Davidski have suggested, it seems much more likely from a genetic perspective that the Corded Ware is the mother of PIE 3 at least, and that all branches except Anatolian and probably Tocharian can be derived from it.
  5. Indo-Iranian comes from Abashevo and other easterly Corded Ware variants, and it's even more easterly later extension to the other side of the Urals, Sintashta, which later led to Andronovo. This is confirmed because Sintashta and Andronovo contain EEF and WHG ancestry which Yamnaya lacked, therefore, the Indo-Iranians can't be derived directly from the Yamnaya steppes; they have to be derived from the Corded Ware. Corded Ware itself can probably be derived from the western portion of the steppes, which spread northwest into the forest steppes and the European plain before spreading eastward again over the steppes. Exactly the relationship between Yamnaya and Corded Ware is unclear; they were genetically clearly very close, but Corded Ware had picked up some Neolithic European admixture, whereas Yamnaya were more "pure" WSH in their genetics. However, the later Indo-Europeans all show signs of this admixture, suggesting that ultimately the Yamnaya were perhaps mostly a dead end after they separated genetically from the Corded Ware, and that the roots of the rest of the Indo-European family from PIE 3 onwards are to be found in the Corded Ware, not the Yamnaya. Granted, I'm adding a bit more than what Koch himself said; he only said that in regards to Indo-Iranian, but as I've got from reading Eurogenes for some time now, I think it's a bit broader than Koch is admitting here. See the map below for early Corded Ware and Yamnaya spheres before Corded Ware expanded.
  6. The sixth working hypothesis is a multi-part one, and is in many ways supportive of the Celtic from the West argument. It suggests that since 1) the Beaker cultural package seems to have had some kind of genesis with Atlantic non-Indo-European natives, 2) it was adopted by westerly Indo-Europeans of the Single Grave Corded Ware variant, and 3) the spread of the Beaker culture along with significant genetic replacement by Single Grave male lineages (but in many cases retaining native female lineages) that Celtic in particular emerged out of the interaction of Indo-European with a non-Indo-European substrate. A lot of correspondances can be made between Celtic and Basque/Aquaitanian and Iberian. Celtic from the West is a bigger hypothesis than what Koch is suggesting here, which he knows quite well, but this is just the executive summary portion of a part of the arguments that support it. Personally, I'm finding myself more and more in favor of it over time. Given that Koch is also one of the proponents of this theory, its no wonder that he put a working hypothesis in that supports it.
  7. Working hypothesis 6, along with other details, suggests that Basque and probably related languages like Aquitanian and maybe Iberian, which don't exist anymore today and only barely registered briefly in the Roman and Greek historical records, was there already when the first Indo-Europeanization of the Atlantic region started. While the paleohispanic linguistic situation, prior to the Latinization of the peninsula, is not as complicated as the paleobalkan linguistic situation, it's still got its share of mysteries. Some languages are obviously Celtic, some are Vasconic (Basque, Aquitanian, and possibly Iberian, although this is disputed), some may be para-Celtic, i.e., a separate branching of the Italo-Celtic branch, but linguistic dead-ends and unknown to us today, or perhaps some other type of ambiguous Indo-European, and some may be non-Indo-European, but also non-Vasconic. Some may even have a North African antecedent; we know from historical sources that the Carthaginians were very active in pre-Roman Hispania, after all. While Koch himself is the proponent of the idea that the Tartessian language is a Celtic one and its meager carved inscriptions can even be translated, this isn't widely accepted, and the mainstream opinion would be more likely to see ties to Iberian and Aquitanian. If true, and that's a big if because little is known about any of those languages really, then it would imply a larger Vasconic linguistic presence in Iberia prior to Indo-Europeanization. This begs the question, as Koch notes, that maybe Vasconic was much more widely spread than even that. While Colin Renfrew's Anatolian hypothesis never really worked from a time-depth and linguistic period, and genetics has pretty much killed it stone dead (it is an EX-hypothesis!) he was right in pointing out that the Neolithic expansion of Anatolian farmers who became the Early European Farmer (EEF) genetic clade and which spread into Europe on two fronts (along the northern Mediterranean coast in the Cardial Ware horizon, and up through the Balkans to Central Europe and beyond in the "Old European" Balkan cultures like Vinča and Starčevo clusters and the vast LBK horizon) probably brought a single language, or at least tightly related language family with them which had originated in the Mesolithic/Neolithic boundary in Anatolia. Is Basque the sole survivor of this linguistic spread ~5500 BC? While certainly plausible, the fact the WHG DNA survives in appreciable numbers into the Bronze Age in Iberia and elsewhere in Europe (even having a resurgence in the Funnelbeaker and Globular Amphora cultures, among possibly others) means that we can't rule out a Mesolithic ancestry for this language group. Koch suggests that more work be done (although where more material to work with is unknown) in trying to find correspondences between known languages like the non-Indo-European paleohispanic languages, Etruscan, Minoan and Eteo-Cretan, and non-Indo-European languages of Anatolia like Hattic and Hurrian to see if anything can be untangled here. But he's clearly suggesting a working null hypothesis of a Vasconic family being associated with the Neolithic farmer spread, which survives today only in the form of Basque in the Pyrenees. While this is fine, few people suggest an Etruscan and Vasconic link, and Etruscan is a reasonably well-known non-Indo-European language of Europe, and may be part of a more wide-spread Tyrsenian language family. How do Tyrenian and Vasconic compare? Are there connections? According to most linguists, no, none. Both are isolates. But this is known to be speculative, and Koch is calling for more work and research. Honestly, the tapestry of Neolithic cultures of Europe and their relationship to each other still needs some work period. It is possible that the two waves of EEF expansion brought different language families; the Cardial Ware being more Tyrsenian, for example, and the Starčevo to LBK being Vasconic, or something like that, or one or the other may be an older WHG holdout, or something else entirely may be happening too. Maybe Vasconic's origins are to be found in North Africa across from Iberia. Maybe the Etruscans are actually intrusive to Italy and come from somewhere else more recently than the Neolithic spread, as Greek writers seem to suggest, linking them with the Pelasgians and other far westerly Anatolian and Aegean peoples.
It's difficult to say, since genetically as far as we know, the EEF group forms a pretty solid cluster, not a widely spread group, although some admixture is known to have happened, and the Mediterranean was a conduit for travel for a long time in both the prehistoric and historic eras, bringing people from Anatolia, Southern Europe, North Africa and the Levant into association. But one people can't be expected reasonably to be responsible for the spread of two completely unrelated language families, as well as to originate in an area known for two other completely unrelated isolate languages—Hattic and Hurrian. How many language groups were lurking about in Anatolia anyway, all spoken by genetically indistinguishable people in a small geographical area?

As Koch says, there's plenty of tantalizing hints of stuff going on, but very little real knowledge. More work, if something to work with could be found, would be most welcome in untangling this mess. What would be especially helpful is if enough new Linear A (presumably Minoan) and Vinča script work could be found that those languages could be partially deciphered and studied with regards to their potential relationship to other known languages. But don't hold your breath for that to happen.



Thursday, January 14, 2021

Companions

Like everyone, I'm often distracted by current events right now, and I am often actively seeking to distract myself from current events right now. Vox Day, as is often the case, says it best—to be patient, because disinformation is the order of the day, and few people know what's really going on, and those people are necessarily not talking about it. Meanwhile, the people who are talking are known liars and the only thing you can trust from them is that you shouldn't ever trust what they say.

So, today I'll try to make two posts; the first a very frivolous one about the companion characters in Star Wars: The Old Republic (SWTOR) and the second a more interesting one summarizing and commenting briefly on a paper I got from academia.edu by John T. Koch on Indo-European branching, which presents several working hypothesis (although right away, I have an issue with the first one. But still; good work overall.) Granted, I'm not an Indo-European expert, so maybe nobody cares what I think of his paper, but precisely because I'm not mired in the details that the experts wrangle over, I think I'm able to see big picture stuff fairly well. At least I like to think so. In any case, here's a teaser image from that paper attached the post, which I quite like. I also like the division of Proto-Indo-European into various "stocks" representing the unified body of languages at various stages after other sub-families "split off." This makes the assumption that there are ten known subfamilies, while noting that various "big time" branches have completely unknown affiliations, such as Thracian, and therefore have to be ignored for purposes of this tree.

Let me explain very briefly the image, but I'll keep further commentary for the other post. Which may happen today or tomorrow, depending on my time today. Proto-Indo-European 1, or PIE 1, would be the last "complete" Proto-Indo-European language, and would include the Anatolian branch, the first to split off. PIE 2 is after Anatolian splits off, and right before the Tocharian branch splits off. PIE 3 is on the verge of spinning out Albanian, PIE 4 is on the verge of spinning out the Italo-Celtic languages, PIE 5 is on the verge of spinning out the Greco-Armenian branch (and possibly Phrygian, as part of this branch? The paleo-Balkan language situation is a Charlie Foxtrot for sure.) PIE 6 is the last of the "unified" part of Indo-European, although it could really just be called the Balto-Slavic branch + the Indo-Iranian branch. The placement of Germanic is tricky, and it "floats" over the image, but that's part of the discussion. From the get-go, the placement of Germanic has been tricky, as there are things that tantalizingly seem to pull it towards the Balto-Slavic branch and others that pull it towards the Italo-Celtic branch in the estimation of linguists. To me that makes Germanic one of the more interesting of the bunch, and the fact that of course I speak a Germanic language as my native language, and my genetics go back nearly a thousand years to people of Germanic descent (although the oldest guy we have information for was a Norman and the father of one who crossed the English Channel with William the Conquerer; technically a Germanic person speaking a Romance language! That said, my ancestry is overwhelmingly Anglo-Saxon and British Celtic, not Frankish, Viking or Norman) makes it doubly interesting to me. 

Anyway, that's for next time. Right now, I want to refer to this relatively recent article on companions in SWTOR (written at the end of 2019 makes it just over a year old, but still—given the age of the game, that's pretty recent.) Although I haven't yet finished all of the stories of all of the characters (or even started with a few of the classes) I've seen enough on Youtube playthroughs over time to feel reasonably confident to comment, without being myself (yet) a "legendary player" who's completed all eight class stories. (As an aside, I'm about three fourths of the way through Knights of the Fallen Empire with my Jedi Knight, I'm due to start the Shadow of Revan with my Sith Warrior, I'm well into chapter 2 with my Smuggler and just starting chapter 1 with my Agent. And, as a reminder, although I'm starting over with a new character, I did do all the way through chapter 1 with a bounty hunter before accidentally ending up locking out my companion stories by doing some Onderon stuff. Ugh. That's why I made a story progression tracker in Google Sheets to make sure that I didn't screw anyone else's stuff up.)

Let's see my commentary on best companions:

Jedi Knight: I mostly agree, although I tend to like bringing T7 along quite a bit, and I think Doc has tons of interesting dialogue. His backstory isn't quite as intriguing as that of Scourge, but his dialogue is funnier. Most of that character-building stuff happens in the ship between planets anyway, although there's some interesting snippets here and there if you have the right character with you at the right time.

Sith Warrior: I'm not completely in agreement. I don't like Vette as much as the rest of the crew seems to. I think if she were human instead of Twi'lek, I probably would, but she's not, so that's a moot point. Also, I did light side Jaesa, and can't really imagine doing the dark side stuff. The morality of Star Wars games, particularly when it's trying to portray the dark side, is puerile and stupid. While this goes both ways quite often, where blatantly immoral acts are light side (like lying and breaking your word, and abandoning your responsibilities to your people), it's particularly egregious with the dark side stuff. My Sith Warrior did more light side than dark side choices, mostly—but not always, because they didn't always make any logical sense either. In any case, doing things that way means that my experience with Jaesa in particular was very different. I like her, especially with the red-hair or blond-hair customization options for light side, and the platonic romance between them was kinda amusing—with a big pay-off coming at the end of the expansion storylines when you're reunited and it is a full-on regular romance. Best romantic partner pay-off in the game, although it requires patience to pull off.

Jedi Consular: While I confess to not being super informed on this one, from what I have seen, I think that it's a reasonable assessment.

Sith Inquisitor: I'll say more or less the same thing about the consular, although the fact that your "default" romance option isn't usually considered one of the best companions to take along should be a clue that the romance options aren't really satisfactory. In my opinion, your "romanceable" companion should be your first choice, and if it's not, that's not a great romance.

Trooper: Once again, I'll defer to the article, as I don't really have the expertise to rebut it. But my playthrough on Youtube experience would tend to agree, or at least not have any reason to question it. I'd be interested, quite honestly, in who the worst companion choices would be too. Heck, they should have ranked the "full stable."

Bounty Hunter: 100% agree with Mako. Despite the weird sharky name, she's one of the better NPC characters in the game period, and a perfectly written match for the hunter. I'm a little less sold on Torian, although if you're playing a female character and want a romanceable option, I guess that moves him up. Gault Renow is much funnier to have around. Blizz is entertaining, but the novelty value tends to wear off after a while.

Smuggler: I agree with this assessment. I will say that I'm disappointed that you have so many interactions with Risha before she's your companion, so you can't apply a customization yet. And that you pick up Guss pretty late; he'd be fun to have around longer.

Agent: Sigh. The poor agent. I really dislike Kaliyo, who's the first (main?) companion and default romance option, so I suppose this is a good enough list. I don't much like Vector either. Raina Temple I probably prefer to SCORPIO, because she's my actual romance choice (after applying a customization that makes her white; either #4 on Belsavis or #9 from the GTN). But in general, his team is my least favorite of the eight classes. Which is too bad, because he's one of the most interesting characters himself, and has one of the best plots. Putting him as a default with Kaliyo almost seems like it's a deliberate emasculation of James Bond in space.

It's interesting, of course, that pretty much nobody picks Kaliyo as a favorite companion for the agent or a favored romance option overall. Luckily, they actually gave you an alternative, even if you can't pick it up until fairly late, in the form of Temple.

Monday, January 11, 2021

The Panopticon

Some good advice. I haven't always followed it as I should, but one needs to rethink these things, right, and repent of past foolishness.  

When woodworking with power tools, I routinely ask myself, "If I fell into this tool right now, what would happen?" If the risk is too great, I reorient myself and attempt to do the job safer. There's risk in all of it, or I could go back to hand saws and chisels. It's all about managing risk.

I think that every Christian and conservative (or whatever political strip which is not woke) needs to ask, "What if everything I ever said, did, or where I even went was instantly exposed to my spouse, church, employer, and eventually greater world?". 

You are standing over that dangerous tool every moment you use an iPhone, Android device, or PC. One must never stop asking that question so you understand the risks you are taking and what it means for your future.

The reality is that although we are dangerously close to living in an evil Panopticon that threatens us for our attempts to be righteous, and reality is that we have always lived in an eternal and eternally just Panotpicon, for God has always watched everything that we've ever done.

Luke 12:

2 For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known.

3 Therefore whatsoever ye have spoken in darkness shall be heard in the light; and that which ye have spoken in the ear in closets shall be proclaimed upon the housetops.

But with regard to the evil Panopticon of Big Tech and their allies; be cautious and be wary. 

Thursday, January 07, 2021

America current year

 As a fitting epitaph for 2020, here's some words from the Z-man. I'm quoting most of his post today, because it's fitting that it not be too broken up.

https://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=22458

Yesterday, Ashli Babbitt was shot in the neck and died while protesting inside the Capitol with other protestors. A group of angry Trump supporters had got into the building and were making a racket. This is not an unusual occurrence. During the Kavanaugh hearings, Democrats organized mobs of screeching women to harass Republicans in the halls of the Capitol. Party media was there to celebrate it as the purest expression of democracy. It was power to the people time.

That was not the case yesterday, according to the media. Instead, it was a direct threat to “our” democracy. This is a bit ironic in that the protests are over the obvious corruption in the election system. The direct threat to democracy is the people demanding their elections be fair and honest. That’s why Ashli Babbitt was inside the Capitol making a racket. Her whole life she had been told this was how citizens angry at their government demand redress when the system fails.

That is how popular government is supposed to work. The people expect their government to be responsive to the will of the people. When they don’t like that they see, they vote for different people to hold office. If those politicians ignore the people, then the people go bang on their door and demand redress of their grievances. The politicians then come out and address their issues. That’s not it works now. Instead, they open fire on the people like they did yesterday.

Ashli Babbitt was not some drug-addled degenerate, like we saw last summer, when the ruling class unleashed their mobs on us. She was a veteran, serving 14 years in the US Air Force, and she was a high-level security official throughout her time in service. She was like most of the people at the protest, in that she had bought into what she was told about America. So much so she signed onto serve in the military and go overseas in various deployments.

Like most of the protestors, she was there because she had spent her life playing by the rules and defending those rules. She was there because the people in charge of maintaining the rules have been violating those rules. They ignored the official corruption in the 2016 election and they laughed about the grotesque fraud that was plainly obvious in the 2020 election. Like the rest of those protestors, she was angry that the politicians were not following the rules.

For her trouble, she died in a pool of her own blood inside what is supposed to be the people’s house in America. It is a bit ironic that a citizen exercising her rights would be murdered by an agent of a corrupt system that is now infringing on her rights. Murder is the right word here. The man who shot her was under no threat and was on the other side of a locked and barricaded door. The murderer was part of Vice President Pence’s security detail. The video, for those interested, is here.

There will be no charges against the murderer. Unlike the cops involved in the George Floyd case or any number of others, this coward will not be fired from his job or face criminal charges. He will probably get a medal. He will not have his face and address plastered all over the media, so that he can be attacked by mobs. There will be no media orchestrated campaign to defund the police over this. Most likely, the whole thing will be put on mute so that the public forgets it.

Of course, unlike George Floyd, Ashli Babbitt will not get three nationally televised funerals and be treated as a fallen hero. That honor goes to drug-addled criminals who overdose in police custody. In this America, patriots who served their country and exercise their rights get gunned down by agents of the state. This woman, this patriot, bleeding out in the halls of the Capitol, murdered by an agent of the state, is the perfect image of what has gone terribly wrong in America.

No doubt, millions of decent people who sympathized with her cause are saddened by this terrible tragedy. It did not have to come to this. This was not an accident. This was not a terrible misfortune. The people on the other side of that door, the people who celebrate the murderer of Ashli Babbitt now, they did this. They created this crisis that threatens to plunge to country into a death spiral. They had choices and they had plenty of warning, but they refused to listen and now Ashli Babbitt is dead.

The Heroes of Capitol Hill

Quoting first Sarah Hoyt. She's a notorious Fake American, who goes on and on and on about being Portuguese, but she's sometimes a better friend to the Americans than people who are the literal descendents of the Founding Fathers and the Colonists. When she can get over trying to establish her place in America, she often has something useful to say about America. As she should. She's the wife of an American, after all.

When Democratic Party leaders find excuses for left-wing violent protesters and condemn right-wing protesters, one can understand their motives. They see left-wing protesters as being “on their side” and the right-wing protesters as “the enemy.” When Republican Party leaders find excuses for left-wing violent protesters and condemn right-wing protesters, it’s hard not to draw the conclusion that they, too, see the left-wing as “on their side” and the right-wing as “the enemy.”

For years I’ve told the left that when they used fraud to win, they’d broken the feedback mechanism.  It didn’t mean their ideas were winning, that people agreed with them, or that they were safe. It was the equivalent of breaking the fire alarm and thinking they were safe from fires. What I never expected was to hear the right condemn the people trying to break out of the burning building, because they don’t hear any fire alarms.

The same government that scrutinizes all our actions on a daily basis and presumes we’re guilty until proven innocent, when questioned by the people about the obvious flaws and issues of the elections refused any examination and told us that everything was fine, or if not, we had no standing. We should just trust their word over our lying eyes. Next thing you know, they’ll tell us to eat cake.

And for the record, no, I will not condemn the protesters. Should they have gone into the Capitol? I don’t know. Why shouldn’t they have? It’s not like they went and hanged the corruptocrats using their own intestines as ropes. They might — or might not. Really, do you trust the reporting? In this time, in this place? — have broken windows. And then walked, carefully between the ropes? Sure, why not. Let’s roll with that narrative.  They might have made a mess of Nancy Ice Cream Pelosi’s office. Maybe. Again…. reporting? You know what they didn’t do? They didn’t kill anyone. That was reserved for someone who shot through a door sidelight at a protester.  You know what else they didn’t do? Use live ammo.  You know what else they didn’t do? Trample the flag, which the capitol police did, while being begged not to. You know what else they didn’t do? shine lasers in cops eyes, set fire to the building, loot it, or shoot fireworks at people. Spare me your pearl clutching. How do you propose we get our republic back if demonstrations are “rude?” When they committed blatant fraud in two elections, right before our eyes, and thereby abolished the representative part of the republic, and with it the constitutional part, what are you going to do? Write them strongly worded letters? Or wait till they fraud 2022 just as blatantly, while you stand around being utterly stunned? It’s time to ditch the Marquis de Queensberry rules.  It’s time to stop fighting with our feet in a bucket. Yes, what happened today was very very bad. Yes, it means that what comes next will probably come with a butcher’s bill.

You know, I do wonder why the Sons of Liberty bothered to attack the British. And why the founding fathers had an army.  I mean, couldn’t they have asked the tyrant, politely, to just remove the foot from their neck and give them representation. Oh, wait, they tried that, just like we tried the courts. Curiously, it didn’t work. It’s almost like those in power don’t care what you say, if you can’t do anything to remove their power.

And also quoting Vox Day. The bleeping out is my own work, however.

Meanwhile, Glenn Reynolds and Ed Driscoll are falling all over themselves to denounce the "violence" and condemn the "marauders".

ENDORSED: Trump Needs to Forcefully Condemn the Rioters, Not Coddle Them. - Ed Driscoll

YES. "Rep. Dan Crenshaw, who lost an eye fighting our enemies in Afghanistan, had a message for the marauders on Capitol Hill: "The people in this Capitol are not your enemy... this is not okay," he said. "This should be condemned. I'm saddened and disappointed by what I've seen." - Glenn Reynolds

F*** you, Ed Driscoll. F*** you too, Glenn Reynolds. You're not on our side. You're not on President Trump's side. You're not on the side of truth and justice. And you're not on America's side. F*** ALL the cucks and cons and all their damned bow ties too, as they denounce imaginary violence in a city named for a man who led an army against his own government.

The same goes for every single conservative and Republican who denounces the Heroes of Capitol Hill and cries crocodile tears about the American people resisting their betrayal by their so-called representatives. Forget them, ignore them, despise them, and don't EVER give them so much as the time of day again. Don't ever forget their betrayal of the American people and don't ever let them forget it. I certainly won't.

Also, note that every would-be commenter who claims that President Trump "conceded" or gave up will be spammed. He obviously didn't, so learn to freaking read. As Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said on November 11, "There will be a smooth transition to a second Trump administration.”

And to end it, an interesting observation from "Doktor Jeep":

People who we thought were on our side have cucked too.

Meaning they likely bought the media propaganda. This might be construed as simply being wrong or misled.

But it should be seen as a liability. Anybody who buys anything coming from the media should be seen as gullible and gullible people cannot be relied upon. 

Still upset about the optics of the "violent" "riots"? There was no storming of the Capitol. The patriots were let in. The Narrative of what happened yesterday is a complete and utter lie. Including the story that Trump "conceded."

https://twitter.com/sugaspov/status/1346919943238000645?s=21