NYC

What's his name, the communist Islamicist anti-American who won the mayoral race for NYC; how did it happen? Wring hands.

The answer is pretty obvious, although hardest hit will be virtue-signaling conservatives who applauded it happening until they suddenly realized what it meant. If they've even yet realized what caused the election result.

The big White Flight dip in the 70s is pretty notable too, of course. Same thing happened in most inner cities, perhaps most visibly in Detroit. Thanks, George Romney. You are ultimately responsible for this. You and everyone else who embraced your hateful, anti-American ideology that America wasn't for Americans and had to be stolen from them and given to any rough savage who came along and demanded access to it.

Vox Day said, about this same graph: 

The result of the mayoral election was not only inevitable, it was one of the primary objectives of the architects of the 1965 Immigration and Naturalization Act. This is exactly what those who hate America, hate Christianity, and hate Western Civilization have sought to accomplish since the turn of the 20th Century. Note the steep 25 percent decline in a decade after 1965.

This is the intended result of the so-called “Melting Pot”. It always was. And as New York City has gone, as Minneapolis has gone, so too will go the rest of the United States if Americans do not take control of their country back from the foreigners who have usurped their right to rule themselves.

And contra the New and Improved Nickles Fuentes, an American is not anyone who was born inside the geographic boundaries of the United States, or who was given a piece of paper by the federal government, but rather, the legitimate Posterity of the American revolutionaries for whom the Constitution was written.

Conservatives conserve nothing. They couldn’t conserve America. They couldn’t even conserve the definition of “American”. Which is why conservatism is not, and cannot be, part of the solution.

It's not rocket science. It's literally right there in the Preamble.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

There's been a lot of sophistry around who exactly are the Posterity of the Founding Fathers, but it's blatant and obvious sophistry, because the meaning of the words are quite clear, especially in context. The people who want it to mean something else clearly are afraid—and rightly so, in many cases—that they don't have a legitimate claim of being the Posterity of the Founding Fathers, therefore they engage in sophistry to blow smoke in the faces of the actual Posterity of the Founding Fathers and confuse them in an attempt to claim their legacy for themselves. 

Sorta like a certain stereotype of a certain tribe of lawyers and other corrupt rentiers who engage in stereotypical sophistry in an attempt to bamboozle populations all over Western Civilization since the time that they were a minor yet troublesome Middle eastern tribe in the Roman Empire. Hmm...