Or rather not. I didn't watch it, and now that I've seen summaries and reviews, I almost certainly won't. I wasn't the target audience. People who are really paying attention and are pretty current events savvy and politically/socially aware weren't the target audience. There literally wasn't anything for them in this speech. As Vox Day says, (who apparently didn't watch it either—but he lives in Italy now, so it would have been quite late local time for him):
Reading the reviews of the God-Emperor 2.0’s speech to Congress proved to be a bit deflating. While it was a good summary of what has been accomplished so far, it didn’t really provide us with any new information. Still no arrests. Still members of NATO. There is still a Department of Education, an Internal Revenue Service, and a Federal Reserve.
No one cares about a mineral deal with Ukraine. Everyone wants the US military out of Ukraine, out of Europe, and out of Japan.
There’s nothing wrong with a victories lap. There are certainly more victories to celebrate than anyone was expecting so soon. But everyone was expecting something more, something big, last night. And that speech was nothing big. Frankly, reading his executive orders is more exciting and encouraging.
Yeah, we were certainly hoping for some big announcements along the lines of pulling out of NATO, major arrests, the FBI files on Epstein, or something like that. But I wasn't really expecting it. (I think it's funny and kinda irritating that in Spanish there's only one word that means both hope and expect. Personally, I think they mean quite different things, and as highlighted here, the contrast between what I hope for and what I expect can be quite large.)
Frankly, although the accomplishments of the speech itself were pretty modest, I think it still had some value. Cementing for a new audience who isn't paying enough attention what he's actually done, which the American people generally want him to do, in the faces of the mainstream media who're desperate to spin his presidency so far as something terrible, was valuable. Trashing the Democrat and progressive brands publicly and thoroughly is valuable. Allowing the petulant, entitled bratty little princesses of the Democrat party, like Al Green or whatsherface Slotkin to own goal and trash the Democrat brand publicly and inadvertently because they mistakenly thought that they'd be hailed as "stunning and brave" was even more valuable.
But it was a bit deflating. I felt like I was bait and switched just a bit, being told to tune in for something amazing, and then being told stuff that I already knew. But, like I said, I wasn't really the target audience after all. Apparently the approval rating of the speech was quite high.
I suppose that's probably sufficient justification to do it on its own, in spite of what people like me think of it.