What kind of nonsense is this? Making a decision based on what we already know about coronavirus vaccines like this which were NOT approved for SARS for instance because of known significant safety issues with them isn't rational? Because it's not certain? Certain = rational = science?
Sorry, Adams. I remember when we learned how science works in middle school. I remember learning how to use a dictionary even earlier than that. What you're saying simply isn't true. Not even a little bit. The fact is that the information to make a rational decision absolutely was available. You, Lying Adams, just didn't take advantage of the opportunity to try and find it or understand it. You just listened to "experts" which a rational person would already have known not to trust very far and so should have done the research to make a rational decision.
What's really happening is that you're lying because you're desperate to create an interpretation of reality in which you weren't wrong. Which you are very much starting to believe that you are as more and more info about the "vaccines" comes to light. You are sharp enough to understand that there's a high probability that you were very, very wrong. But you can't imagine how anyone else could have figured that out before you did, so you're lying about what science is and about what a rational decision means.
I don't know if this desperate CYA rearguard action is to try and protect your professional reputation or to protect your toxic beta ego. Either way, it's contemptible. You threw in with the wrong side. And now you want to pretend like you didn't because if YOU didn't know better than NOBODY could have known better. Sorry, but no. You're not that special.
UPDATE: Although published about a week after this post I made, this is a very good descriptor of what's happening with Scott and many Americans who you would think would know better... but who don't. https://neociceroniantimes.wordpress.com/2022/01/04/scott-adams-come-to-fauci-moment/
No comments:
Post a Comment