Environmentalism by PA and Heartiste

I don't often do this, but this is one topic that intersects between many of my interests, and to which I've given a fair bit of thought.  The original post is here:

Environmentalism is complicated. As left wing vanguard politics, it’s the devil wearing a human skinsuit. But in listening to our healthy European voice deep inside, we recoil at the destruction of forests. The European soul loves the forest. Poor is the White man who knows not the joy of time alone deep among trees, the moss, the lawless cries of birds. The European subraces have their own customs with regards to the forest. Teutons, Celts, Slavs… we northeastern Slavs (I’m not that familiar our Balkan brothers, whose spiritual landscape is rocks and mountains, unlike our vast snowy plains) we forage for mushrooms. Every child is an expert on the prize-find vs something that can kill you. 

Special People are desert people, khazar nomads. They hate the forest. They love money and especially monetizing (liquidating) the forests, parceling them off, clear cutting the wood, selling and settling them with alien biped economic units that they bring in to keep the economic churn at high percolation until it all withers like a dead branch and then they move on. The land developer is a particularly loathsome insect. Even if he’s of our ancestry, his soul is twisted in the image of the Special.
[...]
Regarding PA’s comment, I think we all have our personal mystic connections to particular environments — natural and cultural — which reverberate in our souls and likely derive from ancestral memories encoded in our DNA. 

The Special loves the dry, hot, cacophonous market bazaar. 

The NW European loves the forests and verdant meadows. 

The Med Euro loves the rocky shorelines and rolling hills of the interior. 

Highlanders are at home in mountainous terrain. 

We can break down these preferences even further, along ethnic lines. 

This is why, I believe, in a future disaggregated America, the ethnics and races will organically find their way to the regional State which suits their environment template for contented living. I wonder most about White Southerners, if they stay where they are or migrate to a climate and ecology more in tune with their ancestral heritage.

I think it's more complicated than that.  I don't have to look back to my ancestors in the Chalcolithic to see what kind of environment best suits me by genetics.  To me it's very clear; culturally, I'm most at home in the American south—especially Texas, with its hybrid Western/Southern nature.  Environmentally, I prefer the American west; the American savanas, the Rocky mountains and their aspen and pine forests, the red semi-desert cliffs, etc.  I don't need to go back to the Hadrian's Wall territory to feel at home.  America is my home.  It's the nation best suited to me.  My ancestors were brought here by the Lord himself, I strongly believe, and they built this nation for their posterity in what to them was nothing less than a Promised Land, set aside specifically for them.  In any case, the American South is the ancestral heritage of the American southerner.  They've been there for centuries now, and they belong to the land as much as the land belongs to them.

I'm not really too interested in delving too deeply into my spiritual connection to the land of America (lest the swine find my pearls, so to speak), but it is deep.   (A small flavor of what I mean can be seen here.)

On environmentalism, yes it’s a shame that it’s been co-opted by lunatic leftoids when the natural home of nature preservers is on the right (and never more so than today, as leftoidism becomes increasingly the ideological accoutrement of deracinated and denatured urban rat racers). “Climate change” is the way in which the modren shitlib White, who has lost his connection to nature, accesses a path to an ancient racial longing that embarrasses him when spoken of or thought about in reflective moments. 

In the end, the environments beloved by Whites will be ruined by open borders, so all this climate change sanctimony will come to naught. The result of virtue signaling is always a boosted signal at the expense of the virtue.

Conservationism and responsible stewardship of our homeland is the natural position of the Right, actually—not the feckless libertarianism of throwing it all away and privatizing it.  Environmentalism, on the other hand, is nothing more than a mystery cult of virtue-signaling and flagellation.  The more you listen to the prophets of the Green Cult the more obvious it becomes that they are absolutely ridiculous and insane and far removed from any kind of objective reality.